I rarely use it for the reason that many choose Fujifilm, though, and might have been a waste of money. I mostly purchased it, as I at times want to just bring one focal length in a smaller package for street photography, and as I like the look of this camera. In this case, average means that it isn't getting enough use or that I might replace it with something else, not necessarily it being bad. The should of put a rubber bumper at the front instead of the buttom, like most GM lens hoods. The lens hood is just unnecessarily big, and it's like Sigma purposely make them as easily scratchable as possible. The AF could be a bit more sticky at times. I previously had the 35 APO, but I needed AF, and the CV didn't preduce as great sunstars as other CV lenses. I find the amount of purple fringing to be quite noticeable at times. All of the other 35 lenses weren't really for me but the CV 35 APO, but I can't justify multiple lenses with similiar focal lengths. I do need the speed and AF at times, though, so I wouldn't say that it's a total waste. I would like the closed shutter feature when switching lenses.Ī phenomenal lens in itself, but it's probably overkill for most of my use. It isn't anything like an a9 or a1, and the noise quickly builds up. I'm generally satisfied, but I find the AF overhyped. One trick is to see if one will use the so called perfect lens…if we do not use it, whats the point Frogfishīest as in I probably will keep this equipment for a good bit. Thanks for taking time to write the post…very earnest and insightful. Looking forward to the day when I can use the leftovers to dust the furniture. In 20, my best and worse buy, bar none = face masks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |